掺混控释肥侧深施对稻田田面水氮素浓度的影响
作者:
作者单位:

(1.江苏省农业科学院农业资源与环境研究所,农业农村部长江下游平原农业环境重点实验室,江苏 南京 210014;2.南京农业大学农学院,江苏 南京 210095)

作者简介:

侯朋福(1986-),男,博士,副研究员,主要从事农田养分管理与面源污染控制研究。E-mail:pengfuhou100smby@163.com。

通讯作者:

基金项目:

基金项目:国家重点研发计划项目课题“河网平原区稻田面源污染防控技术集成与示范”(2016YFD0801101);水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项课题“太滆运河农业复合污染控制与清洁流域技术集成与应用”(2017ZX07202004);国家自然科学基金“秸秆生物炭与硝化抑制剂配施对南方典型水稻土氮素转化过程的影响”(41601319)。


The effect of side deep fertilization for resin blending controlled-release fertilizer on nitrogen concentration in surface water of paddy field
Author:
Affiliation:

(1.Key Lab of Agro-environment in Downstream of Yangtze Plain,Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs,Institute of Agricultural Resources andEnvironment,Jiangsu Academy of AgriculturalSciences,Nanjing Jiangsu 210014;2.College of Agronomy,Nanjing Agricultural University,Nanjing Jiangsu 210095)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    为了明确掺混控释肥侧深施对稻田氮素损失的控制效果,采用大田试验,以武运粳 23号为试验材料,通过设置无机化肥常规用量分次施用(CN)、掺混控释肥梯度减量一次性基施(常规用量、减量 10%、减量 20%和减量 30%)共 5个处理,研究了掺混控释肥(RBB)减量对太湖地区稻田田面水不同形态氮素浓度的影响及产量效益。结果表明,与无机化肥常规用量分次施用 CN处理(270 kg/hm 2)相比,RBB减量 10%~ 30%不会造成水稻减产。田面水氮素以铵态氮为主,无机化肥施用后田面水氮素浓度在施肥后 1~ 2 d即达到峰值浓度,此后逐渐下降;掺混控释肥处理的 3个肥期田面水氮素峰值浓度较低,均显著低于 CN处理。由于田面水氮素以铵态氮为主,因此总氮均值浓度降低幅度与铵态氮较一致。其中,基肥期、蘖肥期、穗肥期田面水总氮均值浓度两年降低幅度分别为 87.19%~93.87%(2015年)和 76.93%~83.48%(2016年),69.74%~ 79.73%(2015年)和 74.46%~87.52%(2016年),94.43%~96.69%(2015年)和 95.52%~96.57%(2016年)。RBB减量能够降低前期(基肥期和蘖肥期)田面水氮浓度,总体呈随用量减少而降低的趋势。但减量幅度相近处理的田面水氮素浓度未呈现一致性规律变化。结果说明,RBB施用减少了太湖地区稻田肥期氮素流失风险,RBB肥料用量为 189~ 216 kg/hm 2能够在保证水稻产量的前提下降低前期田面水氮素浓度,减少氮素流失风险。

    Abstract:

    In order to make sure the control effect of side deep fertilization for resin blending controlled-release fertilizer(RBB)on nitrogen loss in paddyfields,a field experiment with Wuyunjing-23 rice was carried out to study the effectof reduced application of RBB on nitrogen concentration of surface water and rice yield in Taihuarea.Fivetreatments,namely,conventional split fertilization(CN),RBB with conventional applicationrate(RBB1),reduction by 10%(RBB2),reduction by20%(RBB3),and reduction by30%(RBB4),were setup.The results showed that RBBreductions of 10% to 30% did not result in the reduction of rice yields when compared with CN treatment(270 kg/hm 2).The nitrogen in surface water was mainly ammonium nitrogen.And the nitrogen concentration of surface water reached thepeak concentration on the first or secondday,and then decreased after inorganic fertilizerapplication.The control effectof RBB on nitrogen release wasbetter.The peak concentration of nitrogen in surface water in the three fertilizer periods waslow,which was significantly lower than that of CN treatment.As the nitrogen in surface water was mainly ammoniumnitrogen,thereduction of total nitrogen concentration was more consistent with ammoniumnitrogen.And the mean of total nitrogen concentrationat thebasal,tillering,and jointing stages was reduced by 87.19%~93.87%(2015)and 76.93%~83.48%(2016), 69.74%~79.73%(2015)and 74.46%~87.52%(2016),94.43%~96.69%(2015)and 95.52%~96.57%(2016).RBB reduction treatments reduced the total nitrogen and ammonium nitrogen concentration in the early stage(basal and tilleringstage),and showed a decrease trend with the application amount decreased.However,there was not a uniform regularity ofnitrogen concentration in surface water between RBB reduction of 10% and 20% in 2015,20% and 30% in 2016.The resultsindicated that the application of RBB reduced the nitrogen loss risk in the paddy field in Taihuarea.And RBB rate with 189~ 216 kg/hm2 reduced the nitrogen concentration of surface water and nitrogen loss risk on the premise of ensuring rice yield.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

侯朋福,薛利祥,周玉玲,李刚华,杨林章,薛利红.掺混控释肥侧深施对稻田田面水氮素浓度的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料,2019,(1):16-21.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2018-03-19
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:2018-07-07
  • 在线发布日期: 2019-03-19
《中国土壤与肥料》招聘启事
关闭