不同保水措施对砂质潮土水分、微生物量及小麦产量的影响
作者:
作者单位:

(1.河南农业大学资源与环境学院,河南 郑州 450002;2.济源市农牧局,河南 济源 459000)

作者简介:

李培培(1982-),女,河南开封人,副教授,博士,主要从事土壤培肥研究。E-mail: peipeilee@163.com。

通讯作者:

基金项目:

基金项目:国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFD0301103);河南省科技攻关计划 (农业领域 )项目(172102110057)。


Effects of water conservation measures on soil moisture,microbial biomass and wheat yield in a sandy fluvio-aquatic soil
Author:
Affiliation:

(1.College of Resources andEnvironmental Sciences,Henan Agricultural University,Zhengzhou Henan450002;2.Jiyuan Agriculture and AnimalHusbandaryBureau,Jiyuan Henan459000)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    通过研究不同保水措施对砂质潮土的保水效应、微生物量及小麦产量的影响,为中低产田砂质潮土的土壤改良及小麦产量提升提供科学依据。在黄淮海平原麦 -玉轮作的典型砂质潮土区,设置常规耕作无保水措施的对照(T)、秸秆还田(TS)、生物炭还田(TB)、秸秆与生物炭配合还田(TS+B)和秸秆与保水剂配合还田(TS+W)5种田间保水措施。结果表明,与 T相比,4种保水措施均显著提高了分蘖期土壤含水量,其中 TS+W含水量最高,0~ 20 cm土层增加 21.9%,20~ 40 cm土层增加 69.4%,随着生育期延长,保水效果逐渐降低;与之相反,TS+B处理显著提高小麦生育后期的土壤含水量,在灌浆期提高 18.8%,成熟期提高 32.6%。在小麦分蘖期,0~ 20 cm土层各处理间微生物量碳无显著差异,与 T相比,TS、TB和 TS+W处理显著提高 20~ 40 cm土层中土壤微生物量碳,分蘖期增幅最大的是 TS,提高量为 212.7%,灌浆期增量最大的是 TS+W,提高 31.6%。各处理小麦产量均有所增加,其中 TS+W产量提升 31.4%,其中仅 TS+W与 T处理达到差异显著水平。土壤水分与小麦产量性状、微生物量碳含量的相关分析发现,土壤水分含量是砂质潮土生产力低下的主要限制因素,主要在小麦分蘖期和拔节期影响小麦产量。4种保水措施均不同程度改善砂质潮土的理化性质,增加土壤含水量、微生物量和作物产量,其中秸秆和保水剂配合施用对砂质潮土小麦增产效果最佳。

    Abstract:

    In order to explore the effects of different methods of water conservation on the water holding capacity of sandyfluvio-aquatic soil,soil microbial biomass and wheatyield,a field experiment was carried out for providing scientific and rational basis for the soil improvement in the Yellow-Huaihai plain wheat-maize rotation of the typical sandy soil area.In this study,5 field treatments were designed,including the treatment without water conservation measures(T)ascontrol,straw returning(TS),biocharapplication(TB),combined straw andbiochar(TS+B)and combined straw andwater retaining agent(TS+W). Soil moisture,microbial biomass carbon,soluble carbon and crop yield were comparedand analyzed in different wheat growing stages. Results showed that:compared withT,4 water conservation treatmentssignificantly increased soil water content in wheat tillering stage,and TS+W showed the highest water moisture,increased by 21.9% and 69.4% in 0~ 20 cm and 20~ 40 cm soillayer,respectively. On thecontrary,TS+B significantly increased soilmoisture in the later wheat growingstage,increased by 18.8% and 32.6% in filling stage and ripeningstage,respectively.There were no significant difference of microbial carbon content among all treatment in tillering stage in 0~ 20 cm soil layer,while compared with T, TS, TB and TS+W significantly increased soil microbial carbon in 20~ 40 cm soil layer, TS treatment increased by 212.7% in tillering stage and TS+W treatment increased by 31.6% in filling stage, respectively, and TS+B significantly increased soil microbial carbon in 0~20 cm soil layer. All the four water conservation measures increased wheatyield in some extent.However,only TS+W showed significant difference which increased by 31.4%. Correlations betweensoil moisture and microbial carbon or wheat yield indicated that water was a key factor for the productivity of sandysoils,andtillering stage was more sensitive. The four water conservation methods could increase soil watercontent,microbial biomassand wheat yield in someextent,and the method of combined wheat and water retaining agent was the best inall,and the yield were increased obviously.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

李培培,仝昊天,翟庆慧,韩燕来,姜瑛.不同保水措施对砂质潮土水分、微生物量及小麦产量的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料,2019,(4):78-83.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2018-08-31
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:2018-11-21
  • 在线发布日期: 2019-09-02
《中国土壤与肥料》招聘启事
关闭