旱地农田两种土壤呼吸测定方法的比较
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:

国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)(2011CB100501);国际合作项目(2010DFA34420)


Comparative study of two different soil respiration measuring methods in dryland farm
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    在旱地农田少耕(RT)、传统耕作(CT)和免耕 (NT) 3种耕作土壤上,采用动态密闭气室法(IRGA)与碱液吸收法(AA)同时测定土壤呼吸速率,并对测定结果进行比较。结果表明:(1)在RT、CT和NT 3种耕作土壤上,IRGA与AA两种方法测定结果均呈显著相关,前者测定值分别约为后者的4.48、3.74和4.07倍。(2)IRGA与AA两种方法都具有较好的可信度,相关性达到极显著水平,线性关系式为IRGA=7.42AA-9.73(R2=0.566**,p<0.01), IRGA法测定值约是AA法的4.11倍。(3)IRGA法变异系数较AA法偏大,稳定性小于AA法。

    Abstract:

    In the dryland farm,the dynamic closed-chamber method (IRGA) and the static alkali absorption method (AA) were used to measure the rate of soil respiration at the same time under 3 different tillage treatments, which were straw returned and incorporated by autumn tillage (RT) , conventional tillage (CT) and no-tillage (NT),and the determination values were compared. The results showed: (1)There are significant correlations in both methods(IRGA and AA) under the three tillage treatments and the former determination values were about 4.48, 3.74 and 4.07 times the latter,respectively;(2)Both methods(IRGA and AA) had good reliability, whose correlations were extremely significant and the regression equation was IRGA=7.42AA-9.73(p<0.01).The determination values of IRGA are about 4.11 times the ones of AA;(3)The variation coefficient of the IRGA method was higher than the AA method, the latter’s stability was better than the former.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

张丁辰 蔡典雄 代快 张晓明 冯宗会 王小彬.旱地农田两种土壤呼吸测定方法的比较[J].中国土壤与肥料,2011,(4):1-4.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2010-12-04
  • 最后修改日期:2011-01-28
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期:
《中国土壤与肥料》招聘启事
关闭