复合肥料磷含量测定方法比较
作者:
作者单位:

(1.白山市农产品质量检验监测中心,吉林.白山.134300;2.白山市产品质量检验所,吉林.白山.134300)

作者简介:

王春野(1982-),助理农艺师,大专,主要从事农产品及产地环境检验检测。E-mail:275156645@qq.com。

通讯作者:

基金项目:


Comparison of determination methods of phosphorus content in compound fertilizers
Author:
Affiliation:

(1.Baishan Agricultural Product Quality Inspection and Monitoring Center,Baishan Jilin 134300; 2.Baishan Product Quality Inspection Institute,Baishan Jilin 134300)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    磷含量是衡量复合肥料质量的一个重要指标。GB/T 8573-2017及GB/T 15063-2020都被作为复合肥料磷含量测定的常用方法,通过比较测定磷含量方法之间的差异性,表明测试结果均在允许差要求的范围之内,且准确度较好,不同方法对测定结果没有显著性差异。针对水溶性磷含量测定,超声提取-重量法精密度要优于加水研磨-重量法,且耗时短。针对有效磷含量测定,以EDTA加热微沸-重量法更为简单、快速、效率较高,适合大批量检测。同时为了使数据结果得到更高的准确度,讨论了实验中的关键点。

    Abstract:

    Phosphorus content is an important index to measure the quality of comparism fertilizer. Both GB/T 8573-2017 and GB/T 15063-2020 are commonly used for the determination of phosphorus content in compound fertilizers. This paper compared the difference in phosphorus content between the determination results using the two methods,showed that the test results were within the allowable range,the accuracy was good and there was no significant difference in the results between the two different methods. For the determination of water-soluble phosphorus content,the precision of ultrasonic extraction-gravimetric method is better than that of water-grinding and gravimetric method,and the time consuming is shorter. For the determination of available phosphorus content,EDTA heating micro-boiling gravimetric method is simpler,faster,more efficient and suitable for mass detection. In addition,the key points in the experiment are discussed in order to get higher accuracy of data results.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

王春野,苗辰,赵.东,丁.凯,蔡.毅.复合肥料磷含量测定方法比较[J].中国土壤与肥料,2022,(8):255-260.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-05-07
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:2021-07-07
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-10-10
《中国土壤与肥料》招聘启事
关闭