不同土壤改良剂对酸化土壤微生物群落结构的影响
作者:
作者单位:

(玉林师范学院生物与制药学院,广西 玉林 537000)

作者简介:

乔清华(1989-),助理研究员,博士,主要从事蔬菜病虫害防治等研究工作。E-mail:15066499860@163.com。黄瑞基(1999-),本科,主要研究方向为植物营养与肥料。E-mail:2325780569@qq.com。乔清华与黄瑞基为共同第一作者。

通讯作者:

基金项目:

基金项目:广西自然科学基金项目(2020GXNSFBA297036);玉林师范学院高层次人才科研启动基金项目(G2020ZK06)。


Effects of different soil amendments on microbial community structure in acidified soil
Author:
Affiliation:

(College of Biology and Pharmacy,Yulin Normal University,Yulin Guangxi 537000)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    酸化土壤中微生物多样性降低是土壤养分减少、土传病害高发、作物产量和品质降低的重要原因。施用碱性土壤改良剂是改善酸化土壤理化特性、减少土传病害发生、提高作物产量的有效手段。为了明确不同碱性土壤改良剂对土壤微生物群落结构及多样性的影响,通过盆栽试验比较施用生石灰(S1)及氨基酸生态肥(S2)和黄腐酸水溶肥(S3)对酸化土壤微生物群落结构的改良效果。结果表明,施用3种土壤改良剂后土壤细菌丰富度和多样性均降低,而真菌群落物种丰富度没有显著变化。改良后土壤的主导菌门与改良前相同,而主导菌属存在较大差异。Iamia、Peroneutypa为S1处理特有主导菌属,节核细菌属(Arthrobacter)、德巴利酵母属(Debaryomyces)、Paraphaeosphaeria为S2处理特有主导菌属。根霉菌属(Rhizopus)、裂褶菌属(Schizophyllum)为S3处理特有主导菌属。各改良土壤中,S1处理对细菌的筛选作用最强,S2处理对真菌群落的影响最大,而S3处理相对丰度增加的菌属最多。3种土壤改良剂均能够抑制有害土壤微生物的生长和定殖,但抑制机制可能存在差异。综上所述,3种土壤改良剂均能改善酸性土壤微生物群落结构,但是改良效果存在差异。研究结果为改良土壤微生物功能进一步研究及防治土传病害提供了理论依据。

    Abstract:

    The decrease of microbial diversity in acidified soil is an important reason for the loss of soil nutrients,the high incidence of soil borne diseases and the decrease of crop yield and quality.The application of alkaline soil amendment is an effective means to improve the physical and chemical characteristics of acidified soil,reduce the occurrence of soil borne diseases and increase crop yield.In order to clarify the effects of different soil amendments on soil microbial community structure and diversity,a pot experiment was conducted to compare the improvement effects of quicklime(S1),amino acid ecological fertilizer(S2)and fulvic acid water-soluble fertilizer(S3)on the microbial community structure of acidified soil.The results showed that the richness and diversity of soil bacteria were decreased after the application of three soil conditioners,while the species richness of fungal community had no significant change.The dominant phylum of the improved soil was the same as that before the improvement,but there were great differences in the dominant genus.Iamia and Peroneutypa were the unique dominant genera of S1,and Arthrobacter,Debaryomyces and Paraphaeosphaeria were the unique dominant genera of S2.Rhizopus and Schizophyllum were the unique dominant genera of S3.Among the improved soils,S1 had the strongest screening effect on bacteria,S2 had the greatest impact on fungal community,and the number of genus that relative abundance increased the most was in S3.The three soil amendments all could inhibit the growth and colonization of harmful soil microorganisms,but the inhibition mechanism might be different.In conclusion,the three soil amendments can optimize the microbial community structure of acidified soil,but the optimization effects are different.The results of this study can provide a theoretical basis for the further study of microbial function in improved soil and the control of soil borne diseases.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

乔清华,黄瑞基,盛福瑞,王小敏,刘强,黎建玲,任振新.不同土壤改良剂对酸化土壤微生物群落结构的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料,2023,(2):62-72.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-12-31
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:2022-04-06
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-05-16
《中国土壤与肥料》招聘启事
关闭