氮肥减施时期对水稻产量、氮肥利用率及氮肥去向的影响
作者:
作者单位:

(1.浙江省平湖市植保土肥技术推广中心,浙江 平湖 314200;2.浙江省农业科学院环境资源与土壤肥料研究所,浙江 杭州 310021)

作者简介:

李建强(1981-),高级农艺师,本科,主要从事土壤肥料技术研究与推广工作。E-mail:275279089@qq.com。

通讯作者:

基金项目:

浙江省尖兵、领雁研发攻关计划(2023C2005,2023C2015);杭州市重点科技研发计划项目(202204T05);国家化肥减量增效示范项目。


Effects of nitrogen reduction time on rice yield,nitrogen use efficiency and fate of fertilizer nitrogen
Author:
Affiliation:

(1.Pinghu Plant Protection and Soil Fertilizer Extension Center of Zhejiang Province,Pinghu Zhejiang 314200;2.Institute of Environment,Resource,Soil and Fertilizer,Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Hangzhou Zhejiang 310021)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    为探明氮肥减施时期对水稻产量、氮肥利用率及氮肥去向的影响,为制定科学合理的水稻氮肥减施措施提供理论支持。于2018—2019年,在大田条件下设置5个处理:(1)不施氮肥(N0);(2)常规施肥(N1,N 225 kg/hm2,基肥、分蘖肥、穗肥分别为N 90、67.5、67.5 kg/hm2);(3)基肥减氮(N2,N 202.5 kg/hm2,基肥、分蘖肥、穗肥分别为N 67.5、67.5、67.5 kg/hm2);(4)分蘖肥减氮(N3,N 202.5 kg/hm2,基肥、分蘖肥、穗肥分别为N 90、45、67.5 kg/hm2);(5)穗肥减氮(N4,N 202.5 kg/hm2,基肥、分蘖肥、穗肥分别为N 90、67.5、45 kg/hm2)。2019年在施氮处理小区内设置15N稳定同位素示踪微区试验。结果表明:与常规施肥(N1)相比,减氮10%不会降低水稻产量。然而,不同减氮时期对水稻产量有显著影响,N2处理的水稻产量较N3处理增产7.8%~9.4%。N2和N3处理较N1处理显著提高了氮肥表观利用率和氮肥偏生产力,而N1和N4处理间氮肥表观利用率无显著差异。与N4处理相比,N1和N2处理均显著增加了植株对15N肥料的吸收量。各处理15N肥料利用率为26.0%~30.1%,其中N2处理显著高于N4处理。15N肥料主要残留在0~20 cm土层中,其约占15N肥料总残留量的90%。基肥减氮(N2)可以提高水稻15N肥料利用率和残留率,降低氮肥损失率。因此,减少施氮量应减少基肥中的氮肥用量,不仅可以保证水稻产量,而且还能提高氮肥利用率,减少氮肥损失。

    Abstract:

    In order to investigate the effects of nitrogen reduction time on rice yield,nitrogen use efficiency and fate of nitrogen fertilizer,and to provide a theoretical support for formulating scientific and reasonable nitrogen reduction practice in the rice production. A field experiment was conducted during 2018-2019 and a 15N micro-plot experiment was set up in 2019. Five treatments were included:(1)no nitrogen fertilizer(N0);(2)conventional fertilization(N1,N 225 kg/hm2,basal-tillering-panicle fertilizer = N 90-67.5-67.5 kg/hm2);(3)basal nitrogen reduction(N2,N 202.5 kg/hm2,basal-tillering-panicle fertilizer = N 67.5-67.5-67.5 kg/hm2);(4)tillering nitrogen reduction(N3,N 202.5 kg/hm2,basal-tillering-panicle fertilizer = N 90-45-67.5 kg/hm2);(5)panicle nitrogen reduction(N4,N 202.5 kg/hm2,basal-tillering-panicle fertilizer = N 90-67.5-45 kg/hm2). The results showed that reducing current nitrogen rate by 10% could still maintain rice yields,compared with the N1 treatment. Whereas,nitrogen reduction times had significant effects on rice yields,and N2 treatment increased rice yields by 7.8%-9.4%,compared with N3 treatment. The N2 and N3 treatments significantly enhanced the nitrogen apparent recovery efficiency and nitrogen partial factor productivity,compared with N1 treatment,while there was no significant difference in nitrogen use efficiency between N1 and N4 treatments. Compared with N4 treatment,both N1 and N2 treatments significantly increased the uptake of 15N labelled fertilizer by rice plant. The 15N use efficiencies in nitrogen fertilized treatments were 26.0%-30.1%,of which N2 treatment was significantly higher than that of N4 treatment. The 15N-fertilizer mainly remained in 0-20 cm soil layer,accounting for about 90% of the total 15N residue. Basal nitrogen reduction(N2 treatment)could improve the 15N use efficiency and residue rate,and reduce the nitrogen loss in paddy soils. In conclusion,reducing the nitrogen application rate should reduce the basal nitrogen rate,which can not only ensure rice yield,and also improve the nitrogen use efficiency and reduce nitrogen loss in rice production.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

李建强,王强,马军伟,马进川,费冰雁,陈照明.氮肥减施时期对水稻产量、氮肥利用率及氮肥去向的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料,2024,(8):147-153.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-10-07
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:2024-01-11
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-11-08
《中国土壤与肥料》招聘启事
关闭