绿肥不同还田方式培肥土壤效益评价
作者:
作者单位:

(青海大学农林科学院,青海 西宁 810016)

作者简介:

姚百伦(1998-),在读硕士研究生,研究方向为农业资源与环境 。E-mail:2514091495@qq.com 。

通讯作者:

基金项目:

基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(32160759);国家重点研发计划项目(2021YFD1700204);国家绿肥产业技术体系项目(CARS-22-Z-17)。


Evaluation of the benefits of different green manure return methods for soil fertility improvement
Author:
Affiliation:

(Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences,QinghaiUniversity,Xining Qinghai 810016)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    揭示绿肥不同利用方式对土壤培肥效益的影响,为青海省东部农业区提升土壤肥力和增加经济收益提供技术支撑和理论依据。本研究采用随机区组设计,试验处理为小麦收获后复种绿肥(箭筈豌豆- 小麦)设置的4种还田方式,即绿肥全量还田、绿肥根茬还田、绿肥过腹还田及不种植绿肥对照(CK),在小麦收获期采集样品测定小麦养分、农艺性状指标和土壤肥力指标。结果表明:绿肥过腹还田、根茬还田与CK 相比小麦产量、地上部吸氮量显著增加,过腹还田处理小麦产量、地上部吸氮量最高,分别为3482.90、106.85 kg/hm2,相比根茬还田、全量还田处理无显著性差异。全量还田穗粒数相比CK 显著提升55.62%,且其茎粗、穗长均达最大值,分别为3.92 mm、8.09 cm。根茬还田土壤有机质、全氮、碱解氮含量相较CK 分别显著增加20.66%、24.04%、12.62%,全量还田有机质、速效钾含量最大,与根茬还田、过腹还田相比无显著性差异。各还田处理使土壤综合肥力指数提升10.01% ~ 21.52%,其中全量还田土壤综合肥力指数值最大。全量还田土壤微生物碳、氮含量相较CK 分别显著增加18.37%、41.39%,微生物量碳氮比均在10 左右,微生物群落中以真菌为主。全量还田纯收益为8731.37元/hm2,与CK 相比显著增收303.14%,各处理间无显著性差异。综上所述,绿肥全量还田处理效果最佳,不仅可以提升小麦产量及农艺性状,还可以培肥土壤提升土壤综合肥力,以及提高农户经济收益。

    Abstract:

    The study aimed to reveal the effects of different utilization methods of green manure on soil fertility improvement,and to provide technical support and theoretical basis for enhancing soil fertility and increasing economic returns in the eastern agricultural areas of Qinghai province. A randomized block design was adopted,and the experimental treatments included four types of green manure(arrow end pea-wheat)return methods,i.e.,green manure returned to the field totally(GM),root stubble of green manure returned to the field(GR),feeding sheep with the aboveground green manure and sprinkling sheep feces back to the field(GRS),and no green manure planted as the control(CK). The samples were collected during the harvesting period to determine the nutrients,agronomic traits of the wheat,and soil fertility indexes.The results showed that,compared with CK,the wheat yield and nitrogen uptake in GR and GRS treatments were significant increased. The wheat yield and nitrogen uptake in GRS treatment were the highest,which were 3482.90 kg/hm2 and 106.85 kg/hm2,respectively,with no significant difference compared to GR and GM treatments. Compared with CK,GM treatment significantly increased the number of grains in spikes by 55.62%,and its stem thickness and spike length reached the maximum value of 3.92 mm and 8.09 cm,respectively. The content of organic matter,total nitrogen and alkaline dissolved nitrogen of GR treatment was significantly increased by 20.66%,24.04%,and 12.62%,compared with that of CK. The contents of soil organic matter and available potassium in GM treatment were the highest,and there was no significant difference with GR and GRS treatments. All treatments with green manure returning increased the integrated fertility index of the soil by 10.01% 21.52%,with the GM treatment having the highest integrated fertility index value. The soil microbial carbon and nitrogen content of GM treatment increased significantly by 18.37% and 41.39%,respectively,compared with CK,and the microbial carbon and nitrogen ratios were all about 10,with the microbial community dominated by fungi. The net income of GM treatment was 8731.37 yuan/hm2,which was significantly increased by 303.14% compared with CK,and there was no significant difference between treatments. In summary,the effect of green manure full return treatment was the best,which could not only improve wheat yield and agronomic traits,but also fertilize the soil to enhance the comprehensive soil fertility,as well as improve the economic income of farmers.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

姚百伦,宋明丹,韩梅,李正鹏.绿肥不同还田方式培肥土壤效益评价[J].中国土壤与肥料123,2025,(8):156-163

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-12-03
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:2025-01-25
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-10-11
紧急通知:《中国土壤与肥料》编辑部没有给作者发“稿件深度复核邀请”的邮件,也没有“优秀论文深度复核计划”,请收到类似邮件的作者不要加微信,以免受骗。
关闭